The argument moves from what a sociotechnical species is to the responsibility architecture needed when capability moves outward through technological extensions.
The sociotechnical speciesWhy human adaptation must be examined across biological organisms, social organization, and extensions together.
Evolutionary units and formationsHow identifiable responsibility-bearing actors create larger societal, economic, political, scientific, and technological arrangements.
Culture and organizational inheritanceHow meaning, practice, institutions, memory, and learning persist and change across time.
Governing extensionsHow purpose, authority, operating conditions, and responsibility should remain attributable as extensions gain autonomy and reach.
CorrectabilityThe continuing ability of responsible actors to detect, question, stop, revise, repair, and verify consequential action.
Competing civilizational futuresWhy humanity can influence its trajectory without one steersman, and why missions should remain provisional, pluralistic, and correctable.